Qimonda Strikes Out at ITC

We've written before about the increasing popularity of the ITC as a patent litigation forum, particularly for semicon companies.  However, success at the ITC is turning out to be a bit more elusive than hoped for by patent owners.  In the latest setback for a semicon company at the ITC, Qimonda last week lost the first round to LSI and Seagate.  Last year, Qimonda asked the ITC to investigate LSI's and Seagate's importation of certain chips.  Of the four patents asserted (USP 6495918, USP 5851899, USP 5646434, and USP 5213670), three were found to be not infringed and one was invalid. 

Perhaps more interesting is that Judge Rogers found that a domestic industry doesn't exist - i.e., Germany based Qimonda doesn't have enough activity in the U.S. to qualify for protection under Section 337. 

Elpida Buys Qimonda Patents out of Bankruptcy

Digitimes reports that Qimonda has sold its technology licenses and patents related to GDDR memory to Elpida.  Businessweek reports the same thing. 

Recall that Germany based Qimonda entered bankruptcy in 2009 due to the difficult DRAM pricing environment.  Interesting to note that Elpida is simply acquiring the technology and some employees, but not any of the capital equipment or plants of Qimonda.  Anyone still doubting where the true value of a tech company lies?!?!?

 

(Hint:  Engineers and IP)